Building Systemic Practice Into Evaluation Of Knowledge Management Tools
نویسنده
چکیده
In the absence of any truly systemic approach to IS evaluation, an approach to evaluation of knowledge management tools is described. This uses co-operative inquiry as a participatory action research framework. Evaluation of knowledge management tools is seen as problematic due to the close coupling between the technology and the social system that is attempting to manage its knowledge. The paper first explains the rationale for why co-operative inquiry may be a useful framework for structuring a systemic evaluation. Finally several barriers to implementing the framework at the level of the individual and the group are discussed.
منابع مشابه
Reflecting on Backward Design for Knowledge Translation; Comment on “A Call for a Backward Design to Knowledge Translation”
In a recent Editorial for this journal, El-Jardali and Fadlallah proposed a new framework for Knowledge Translation (KT) in healthcare. Many such frameworks already exist; thus, new entrants to the field must be scrutinized in regard to their unique contributions to advancing understanding and practice. The El-Jardali and Fadlallah framework focuses on policy-level discussions, a relatively und...
متن کاملHealth Services Research Spending and Healthcare System Impact; Comment on “Public Spending on Health Service and Policy Research in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States: A Modest Proposal”
The challenges associated with translating health services and policy research (HSPR) evidence into practice are many and long-standing. Indeed, those challenges have themselves spawned new areas of research, including knowledge translation and implementation science. These sub-disciplines have increased our understanding of the critical success factors associated with the uptake of research ev...
متن کاملEvaluation the Curriculum of the Work and Knowledge Branch with Emphasis on Entrepreneurship in Views of Experts
: This study، with the idea of entrepreneurship in mind، was conducted with the goal of evaluating the views of the curriculum experts in the high school vocational branch. The method was survey and statistical community included194curriculum experts and specialists of vocational high schools. Research sample volume(123subjects) was selected randomly based on the Morgan Table and، in the end، o...
متن کاملOn Management Matters: Why We Must Improve Public Health Management Through Action; Comment on “Management Matters: A Leverage Point for Health Systems Strengthening in Global Health”
Public health management is a pillar of public health practice. Only through effective management can research, theory, and scientific innovation be translated into successful public health action. With this in mind, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has developed an innovative program called Improving Public Health Management for Action (IMPACT) which aims to address th...
متن کاملDetermination of Critical Success Factors for Knowledge Management Implementation, Using Qualitative and Quantitative Tools (Case study: Bahman Automobile Industry)
The critical success factors (CSFs) of knowledge management (KM) systems are considered as areas that must be given the required attention for the successful implementation of knowledge management. In this respect and to reduce the failure risk of knowledge management projects, the current paper aims to arrive at a conceptual model by identifying and prioritizing factors for guiding research in...
متن کامل